" # 1 2 6 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
Ca Ce Ch Ci Cl Co Cr Cy
Col Com Con Cov

Conviction of Cassie McIntyre for Confronting Trans-Identified Male in Women’s Restroom

Overview

In March 2024, a prosecution and jury in Portland, Oregon decided to punish the woman trying to stop a male predator from using the women’s restroom at a bar she worked at instead of punishing the male predator himself. Prior, on December 27, 2022, Cassie McIntyre confronted a trans-identified male (Riis Larsen) at a Sellwood neighborhood bar when he tried to use the women’s restroom. She was convicted of a second-degree bias crime by a Multnomah County jury (more evidence if you need it to never visit or live in Portland). Under Oregon’s bias-crime statute, if an action like a shove is motivated in part by bias toward a protected group, that bias upgrades the underlying misdemeanor. Meaning protected groups get more rights and protections than we do in what was made to be a country where all are seen as equal under the law. That one of those protected groups is male fetishists dressing as women is an atrocity we will no longer tolerate. “Misgendering” (aka telling the truth) was part of the context of the case that made her sentencing worse, even though Ms. McIntyre revealed in court that she did not at the time know what misgendering was and had to look up modern trans ideology [^], a belief system so powerful it forces its incorrect beliefs on people who haven’t even heard of it. But in trans world, we are all forced to play by their idiotic religious tenets whether we consent or not. It has been pointed out that McIntyre’s punishment was longer than what some of Portland’s leftwing rioters got.

When Riis tried to use the women’s room, allegedly shoving other women and cutting in front of them, Cassie intervened and confronted him, correctly telling him he is a man and he has no room in the women’s restroom. She allegedly shoved him, which is well within the bounds of acceptable behavior to use against predators lurking where they do not belong. As Riis is a man, McIntyre had no way of knowing he believed he had a woman essence in him (and that is not how bathrooms are segregated anyway).

After the verdict, Ms. McIntyre was humble and apologetic, gaslighted by the woke-corrupted system into thinking she had done something wrong. As a sign of forced contrition, she asked if she could do her community service with an LGBT organization, cleverly showing that (like all of us) she is not a ‘phobe but simply wanted to protect women’s rights, dignity, and safety from growing male encroachment.

Public reaction

Many readers and commentators framed the verdict as an abuse of Oregon’s bias-crime statute and an attack on ordinary efforts to protect women’s safety. Supporters argued McIntyre was acting in the normal course of her job as a bartender to keep a man out of the women’s restroom and that the prosecution treated a routine private-business safety intervention as a criminal act of “bias.” Local social-media threads, petition pages, and women’s-rights discussion groups described the sentence (probation and 50 hours’ community service) as disproportionately punitive and emblematic of a legal system that prioritizes abstract identity categories over tangible privacy and safety.

Criticism of the prosecution & law

Critics pointed to the case as evidence that the bias-crime statute (ORS 166.155) can be applied in ways that conflict with sex-segregated privacy norms. Common criticisms included:

NOTE: Oregon’s bias-crime statute (ORS 166.155) defines bias motivation as acting “because of another’s perceived gender or gender identity.”
This broad language makes no exception for situations where sex-based distinctions are legally permitted, such as separate restrooms or locker rooms, creating tension between privacy laws and anti-bias statutes. Yet another example of the poisoning trans ideology has done to institutions.

Villains of the Incident

More Info